Systemic Study

000000515 001__ 515
000000515 005__ 20200803111429.0
000000515 037__ $$aKN22
000000515 041__ $$ačesky
000000515 100__ $$0AUTHOR|(SYS)dellpaulf$$aDell, Paul F.
000000515 245__ $$aJak rozumět Batesonovi a Maturanovi
000000515 520__ $$aPokusy o pročištění pojmových základů rodinné terapie pomocí “epistemologie” přinesly vzrušení, nudu, podráždění a zmatek. Motivován přesvědčením, že aspoň zmatek je možné zmírnit, předkládá autor tuto stať jako studijního průvodce a tak trochu jako Rozetskou desku pro převod díla Gregory Batesona a Humberta Maturany. Článek ukazuje, že Maturanova práce je dobře slučitelná s prací Batesonovou. Kromě toho článek obsahuje konfrontaci hlavních kontrastních momentů ... Konečně se v článku tvrdí, že důraz na epistemologii odvedl pozornost zastánců i odpůrců od důležitého poselství Batesona a Maturany: sociálním systémům a veškerému lidskému snažení je nutno rozumět ve světle naší existence jakožto biologických entit, které jsou spojeny prostředím. Biologická ontologie implicitní v Batesonových spisech a explicitně načrtnutá v Maturanových může /konečně/ poskytnout spolehlivý základ sociálním a behaviorálním vědám..
000000515 600__ $$0AUTHOR|(SYS)batesongregory$$aBateson, Gregory
000000515 600__ $$0AUTHOR|(SYS)maturanahumberto$$aMaturana, Humberto
000000515 653__ $$0SUBJECT|(SYS)epistemologie$$aepistemologie
000000515 653__ $$0SUBJECT|(SYS)strukturnideterminismus$$astrukturní determinismus
000000515 653__ $$0SUBJECT|(SYS)biologie$$abiologie
000000515 653__ $$0SUBJECT|(SYS)ontologie$$aontologie
000000515 653__ $$0SUBJECT|(SYS)kritickauvaha$$akritická úvaha
000000515 653__ $$0$$aSUBJECT|(SYS)integrativnipokus$$aintegrativní pokus
000000515 65017 $$asam
000000515 65017 $$azlatý fond
000000515 65017 $$acitováno studenty
000000515 678__ $$aFrom Systemic to Clinical Epistemology
000000515 700__ $$0AUTHOR|(SYS)adamovskypetr$$aAdamovský, Petr$$epřeklad
000000515 765__ $$tUnderstanding Bateson and Maturana: Toward a Biological Foundation for the Social Sciences
000000515 773__ $$c45-67$$pKontext$$v23$$y1993
000000515 8564_ $$uhttps://systemika.g-i.cz/record/515/files/Dell Paul Jak rozumet Batesonovi a Maturanovi.pdf
000000515 8564_ $$uhttps://systemika.g-i.cz/record/515/files/Dell Paul Jak rozumet Batesonovi a Maturanovi.gif?subformat=icon$$xicon
000000515 8564_ $$uhttps://systemika.g-i.cz/record/515/files/Dell Paul Jak rozumet Batesonovi a Maturanovi.gif?subformat=icon-700$$xicon-700
000000515 8564_ $$uhttps://systemika.g-i.cz/record/515/files/Dell Paul Jak rozumet Batesonovi a Maturanovi.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa
000000515 909C4 $$dhttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1752-0606.1985.tb00587.x/abstract$$pWiley Online Library
000000515 980__ $$aTRANSLATION

000001789 001__ 1789
000001789 005__ 20150609092051.0
000001789 041__ $$aanglicky
000001789 100__ $$0AUTHOR|(SYS)hallbomkristine$$aHallbom, Kristine
000001789 245__ $$aGregory Bateson, Systems Theory, and Autopoiesis
000001789 400__ $$aHallbom, Kristine
000001789 520__ $$aBateson and Maturana, both contemporary philosophers and systemic thinkers, spent a good part of their academic careers searching for the "Patterns of Life";. Both men have strong backgrounds in cybernetics and were colleagues of the great cybernetician Heinz Von Foerester, who originated the legendary Macy conferences in the 1950's in which cybernetics developer Norbert Wiener played a great part in.
000001789 600__ $$0AUTHOR|(SYS)maturanahumberto$$aMaturana, Humberto
000001789 600__ $$0AUTHOR|(SYS)batesongregory$$aBateson, Gregory
000001789 653__ $$asystémová teorie
000001789 8564_ $$s45724$$uhttps://systemika.g-i.cz/record/1789/files/fe9f1f15-8371-4e85-a888-b48b6ee8ab75-o_19a8rcs2b11ogq81ic2j22cpqa.pdf
000001789 980__ $$aARTICLE

000001632 001__ 1632
000001632 005__ 20150222204116.0
000001632 041__ $$aanglicky
000001632 100__ $$0AUTHOR|(SYS)kennyvincent$$aKenny, Vincent
000001632 245__ $$aDistinguishing Ernst von Glasersfeld’s “Radical Constructivism” from Humberto Maturana’s “Radical Realism”
000001632 520__ $$aErnst von Glasersfeld has dedicated a lot of effort to trying to define just where his views and those of his friend Humberto Maturana part company, epistemologically speaking (Glasersfeld 1991, 2001).As a contribution to unravelling this puzzle I propose in this article to delineate just where they seem to differ most and why these differences arise.
000001632 600__ $$0AUTHOR|(SYS)maturanahumberto$$aMaturana, Humberto
000001632 600__ $$0AUTHOR|(SYS)glasersfeldernstvon$$aGlasersfeld, Ernst von
000001632 65017 $$astudijní materiály/autorské práce
000001632 65017 $$azlatý fond
000001632 653__ $$0SUBJECT|(SYS)radikalnikonstruktivismus$$aradikální konstruktivismus
000001632 653__ $$0SUBJECT|(SYS)kritickauvaha$$akritická úvaha
000001632 8564_ $$s142351$$uhttps://systemika.g-i.cz/record/1632/files/Kenny Vincent - Distinguishing Ernst von Glasersfelds Radical Constructivism from Humberto Maturanas Radical Realism.pdf
000001632 909C4 $$dhttp://www.oikos.org/distinguishingevg%27sradicalcomstructivism.pdf$$pOikos
000001632 980__ $$aARTICLE

000001039 001__ 1039
000001039 005__ 20191027200345.0
000001039 041__ $$ačesky
000001039 100__ $$0AUTHOR|(SYS)maturanahumberto$$aMaturana, Humberto
000001039 245__ $$aCo žabí oko říká žabímu mozku
000001039 520__ $$aJaké jsou důsledky této práce? Podstatné je, že ukazuje, že oko mluví do mozku v jazyce již velmi organizovaně a interpretovaně, místo přenášení více či méně přesných kopii rozložení světla na receptory, jako část analogie, předpokládejme, že má člověk pozorovat mraky a vykazovat je jako meteorologická stanice. Pokud se používá kód, můžeme vidět část oblohy také, pak není těžké zjistit, co říká. Je jistě pravda, že sleduje rozložení světla; nicméně, místní variace světla nejsou termíny, ve kterých se mluví, ani podmínky, v nichž je nejlépe pochopíme.
000001039 653__ $$0SUBJECT|(SYS)maturanovskaneurobiologie$$amaturanovská neurobiologie
000001039 65017 $$astudentské překlady
000001039 65017 $$azlatý fond
000001039 700__ $$0AUTHOR|(SYS)lettvinjy$$aLettvin, Jy
000001039 700__ $$0AUTHOR|(SYS)mccullochws$$aMcCulloch, W.S.
000001039 700__ $$0AUTHOR|(SYS)pittswh$$aPitts, W.H.
000001039 773__ $$c233-258$$pCorning, William C., Balaban, Martin: The Mind: „Biological Approaches to its Functions“. Interscience Publishers$$uhttps://systemika.g-i.cz/record/2088$$xWhat The Frogs Eye Tells The Frogs Brain$$y1968
000001039 8564_ $$s91204$$uhttps://systemika.g-i.cz/record/1039/files/Maturana, H., Lettvin, J. Co zabi oko rika zabimu mozku.pdf$$ypracovni preklad
000001039 8564_ $$s14819$$uhttps://systemika.g-i.cz/record/1039/files/Maturana, H., Lettvin, J. Co zabi oko rika zabimu mozku.gif?subformat=icon$$xicon$$ypracovni preklad
000001039 8564_ $$s57991$$uhttps://systemika.g-i.cz/record/1039/files/Maturana, H., Lettvin, J. Co zabi oko rika zabimu mozku.gif?subformat=icon-700$$xicon-700$$ypracovni preklad
000001039 8564_ $$s140954$$uhttps://systemika.g-i.cz/record/1039/files/Maturana, H., Lettvin, J. Co zabi oko rika zabimu mozku.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$ypracovni preklad
000001039 980__ $$aTRANSLATION

000001043 001__ 1043
000001043 005__ 20190304115213.0
000001043 041__ $$ačesky
000001043 100__ $$0AUTHOR|(SYS)maturanahumberto$$aMaturana, Humberto
000001043 245__ $$aKrása myšlení$$bpřepis části televizního rozhovoru
000001043 520__ $$aPokud nás někdo pozval, abychom opustili tenhle svět jistoty, svět nepopiratelného chápání, a abychom se ještě postavili proti pokušení jistoty, pak to byl Humberto Maturana, biolog, myslitel, muž s neobyčejným zájmem od dětství, začal od emocí, dostal se k vědeckému myšlení a od vědeckého myšlení ho cesta vedla zpět k emocím.
000001043 65017 $$astudentské překlady
000001043 653__ $$0SUBJECT|(SYS)biologie$$abiologie
000001043 653__ $$0SUBJECT|(SYS)interview$$ainterview
000001043 653__ $$0SUBJECT|(SYS)maturanovskaneurobiologie$$amaturanovská neurobiologie
000001043 700__ $$0AUTHOR|(SYS)warnknechristian$$aWarnkne, Christian
000001043 8564_ $$s642458$$uhttps://systemika.g-i.cz/record/1043/files/Maturana.pdf
000001043 980__ $$aTRANSLATION

000001650 001__ 1650
000001650 005__ 20150310192744.0
000001650 041__ $$aanglicky
000001650 100__ $$0AUTHOR|(SYS)maturanahumberto$$aMaturana, Humberto
000001650 245__ $$aAutopoiesis, Structural Coupling and Cognition: A history of these and other notions in the biology of cognition
000001650 520__ $$aMy intent in this essay is to reflect on the history of some biological notions such as autopoiesis, structural coupling, and cognition, that I have developed since the early 1960's as a result of my work on visual perception and the organization of the living. No doubt I shall repeat things that I have said in other publications (Maturana & Varela, 1980, 1988), and I shall present notions"that once they are said appear as obvious truisms. Moreover, I shall refine or expand the meaning of such notions, or even modify them. Yet, in any case, the reader is not invited to attend to the truisms, or to what seems to be obvious, rather he or she is invited to attend to the consequences that those notions entail for the understanding of cognition as a biological process. After all, explanations or demonstrations always become self evident once they are understood and accepted, and the purpose of this essay is the expansion of understanding in all dimensions of human existence.
000001650 65017 $$astudijní materiály/autorské práce
000001650 65017 $$azlatý fond
000001650 653__ $$0SUBJECT|(SYS)autopoiesa$$aautopoiesa
000001650 773__ $$c5-34$$n3-4$$pCybernetics & Human Knowing$$y2002
000001650 8564_ $$s1525678$$uhttps://systemika.g-i.cz/record/1650/files/AutopoesisCouplingCognition.pdf
000001650 980__ $$aARTICLE

000001651 001__ 1651
000001651 005__ 20150218104223.0
000001651 041__ $$aanglicky
000001651 100__ $$0AUTHOR|(SYS)maturanahumberto$$aMaturana, Humberto
000001651 245__ $$aBiology of Language: The Epistemology of Reality
000001651 520__ $$aI am not a linguist, I am a biologist. Therefore, I shall speak about language as a biologist, and address myself to two basic biological questions, namely: 1. What processes must take place in an organism for it to establish a linguistic domain with another organism? 2. What processes take place in a linguistic interaction that permit an organism (us) to describe and to predict events that it may experience?
000001651 65017 $$astudijní materiály/autorské práce
000001651 773__ $$c27-63$$pMiller, George A., and Elizabeth Lenneberg (Eds.) Psychology and Biology of Language and Thought: Essays in Honor of Eric Lenneberg New York: Academic Press$$y1978$$zISBN 0-12-497750-2
000001651 8564_ $$s228816$$uhttps://systemika.g-i.cz/record/1651/files/Maturana, Humberto - Biology of Language the Epistemology of Reality.pdf
000001651 980__ $$aARTICLE

000001652 001__ 1652
000001652 005__ 20150218104223.0
000001652 041__ $$aanglicky
000001652 100__ $$0AUTHOR|(SYS)maturanahumberto$$aMaturana, Humberto
000001652 245__ $$aMetadesign
000001652 520__ $$aThe answers to these two questions would have been obvious years ago: Human beings, of course, machines are instruments of human design! But now days when we speak so much of progress, science and technology as if progress, science and technology were in themselves values to be venerated, there are many people that think that machines as they become more and more complex and intelligent through human design, may in fact become alive so that they may supplant us as a natural outcome of that very venerated progress and expansion of intelligence. Also many people seems to think that evolution is changing its nature so that technology is becoming the guiding force in the flow of the cosmic change in relation to us. I do not hold this view. I do not look at progress, science or technology as if they were values in themselves, nor do I think that biological or cosmic evolution is changing its nature or character. I think that the question that we human beings must face is that of what do we want to happen to us, not a question of knowledge or progress. The question that we must face is not about the relation of biology with technology, or about the relation between art and technology, nor about the relation between knowledge and reality, nor even about whether or not metadesign shapes our brains. I think that the question that we must face at this moment of our history is about our desires and about whether we want or not to be responsible of our desires.
000001652 65017 $$astudijní materiály/autorské práce
000001652 773__ $$pInstituto de Terapia Cognitiva$$y1998
000001652 8564_ $$s338171$$uhttps://systemika.g-i.cz/record/1652/files/Maturana, Humberto - Metadesign.pdf
000001652 980__ $$aARTICLE

000001653 001__ 1653
000001653 005__ 20150218104223.0
000001653 041__ $$aanglicky
000001653 100__ $$0AUTHOR|(SYS)maturanahumberto$$aMaturana, Humberto
000001653 245__ $$aOntology of Observing
000001653 520__ $$aMy purpose in this essay is to explain cognition as a biological phenomenon, and to show, in the process, how language arises and gives origin to self consciousness, revealing the ontological foundations of the physical domain of existence as a limiting cognitive domain. In order to do this I shall start from two unavoidable experiential conditions that are at the same time my problems and my explanatory instruments, namely: a), that cognition, as is apparent in the fact that any alteration of the biology of our nervous system alters our cognitive capacities, is a biological phenomenon that must be explained as such; and b), that we, as is apparent in this very same essay, exist as human beings in laguage using language for our explanations. These two experiential conditions are my starting point because I must be in them in any explanatory attempt; they are my problems because I choose to explain them, and they are my unavoidable instruments because I must use cognition and language in order to explain cognition and language.
000001653 65017 $$astudijní materiály/autorské práce
000001653 773__ $$pTexts in Cybernetics, American Society For Cibernetics Conference, Felton, CA. 18-23 October, 1988$$y1998
000001653 909C4 $$dhttp://www.inteco.cl/biology/ontology/ooo-c1.htm$$pOntology of Observing
000001653 980__ $$aARTICLE

000001654 001__ 1654
000001654 005__ 20150218104223.0
000001654 041__ $$aanglicky
000001654 100__ $$0AUTHOR|(SYS)maturanahumberto$$aMaturana, Humberto
000001654 245__ $$aThe Biological Foundations of Virtual Realities and Their Implications for Human Existence
000001654 520__ $$aTo consider the implications of the operation of the nervous sys- tem – and of the constitution of cultures as closed networks of languaging and emotioning – for how we understand and generate so-called “virtual realities.”
000001654 65017 $$astudijní materiály/autorské práce
000001654 8564_ $$s102342$$uhttps://systemika.g-i.cz/record/1654/files/Maturana, Humberto - The Biological Foundations of Virtual Realities.pdf
000001654 909C4 $$dhttp://issuu.com/gfbertini/docs/the_biological_foundations_of_virtual_realities_an/1$$pThe Biological Foundations of Virtual Realities and Their Implications for Human Existence
000001654 980__ $$aARTICLE