Systemic Study

000000994 001__ 994
000000994 005__ 20150207171703.0
000000994 041__ $$ačesky
000000994 100__ $$0AUTHOR|(SYS)glasersfeldernstvon$$aGlasersfeld, Ernst von
000000994 245__ $$aKonstruktivistická komunikace$$bPřeklad rozhovoru Andrey Pitasi a Ernsta von Glasersfelda
000000994 520__ $$aV okamžiku, kdy si začínáš myslet, že jsi autorem svých vědomostí, musíš brát v úvahu, že jsi za ně zodpovědný. Odpovídáš za to, co si myslíš, protože to jsi ty, kdo přemýšlí, a jsi zodpovědný za to, co jsi dal dohromady, protože to jsi ty, kdo to všechno dal dohromady. To je myšlenka, s níž se těžko souhlasí, a má vážný dopad, protože tě činí opravdu zodpovědným za všechno, co děláš.
000000994 611__ $$0PROJECT|(SYS)sp06$$aSP06
000000994 65017 $$astudentské překlady
000000994 653__ $$aradikální konstruktivismus
000000994 653__ $$apoznání
000000994 653__ $$0$$aSUBJECT|(SYS)komunikace$$akomunikace
000000994 700__ $$0AUTHOR|(SYS)saskovahelena$$aŠašková, Helena$$epřeklad
000000994 700__ $$0AUTHOR|(SYS)pitasiandrea$$aPitasi, Andrea$$einterview
000000994 8564_ $$uhttps://systemika.g-i.cz/record/994/files/Glasersfeld Ernst  Konstruktivisticka komunikace.pdf
000000994 8564_ $$uhttps://systemika.g-i.cz/record/994/files/Glasersfeld Ernst  Konstruktivisticka komunikace.gif?subformat=icon$$xicon
000000994 8564_ $$uhttps://systemika.g-i.cz/record/994/files/Glasersfeld Ernst  Konstruktivisticka komunikace.gif?subformat=icon-700$$xicon-700
000000994 8564_ $$uhttps://systemika.g-i.cz/record/994/files/Glasersfeld Ernst  Konstruktivisticka komunikace.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa
000000994 980__ $$aTRANSLATION

000000998 001__ 998
000000998 005__ 20150309180815.0
000000998 041__ $$ačesky
000000998 100__ $$0AUTHOR|(SYS)glasersfeldernstvon$$aGlasersfeld, Ernst von
000000998 245__ $$aRozlišení pozorovatele: Pokus o interpretaci Maturany
000000998 520__ $$a„Jazykování“, jak občas Maturana vysvětluje, slouží mimo jiné k orientaci. Tím myslí zaměření pozornosti a v důsledku toho i individuálních zkušeností ostatních, což je způsob podpory rozvoje „domén shody“, které střídavě jsou nezbytnou podmínkou rozvoje jazyka. – Třebaže tento výrok (můžete i říci „jazykování“), kterým jsem tady začal, je přinejlepším pouze slabou napodobeninou Maturanova stylu, snad pomůže názorně poukázat na jeden důležitý aspekt Maturanova systému: „Cirkularita“, tak či onak, vyplouvá na povrch znova a znova.
000000998 65017 $$astudentské překlady
000000998 653__ $$0SUBJECT|(SYS)informacniuzavrenost$$ainformační uzavřenost
000000998 653__ $$0SUBJECT|(SYS)autopoiesa$$aautopoiesa
000000998 653__ $$0SUBJECT|(SYS)cirkularita$$acirkularita
000000998 653__ $$0SUBJECT|(SYS)ontologie$$aontologie
000000998 653__ $$0SUBJECT|(SYS)koherence$$akoherence
000000998 653__ $$0SUBJECT|(SYS)biologie$$abiologie
000000998 765__ $$tDistinguishing the Observer: An Attempt at Interpreting Maturana
000000998 8564_ $$s197083$$uhttps://systemika.g-i.cz/record/998/files/Glasersfeld Ernst von Rozliseni pozorovatele (Maturana).pdf
000000998 8564_ $$s16482$$uhttps://systemika.g-i.cz/record/998/files/Glasersfeld Ernst von Rozliseni pozorovatele (Maturana).gif?subformat=icon$$xicon
000000998 8564_ $$s71368$$uhttps://systemika.g-i.cz/record/998/files/Glasersfeld Ernst von Rozliseni pozorovatele (Maturana).gif?subformat=icon-700$$xicon-700
000000998 8564_ $$s267264$$uhttps://systemika.g-i.cz/record/998/files/Glasersfeld Ernst von Rozliseni pozorovatele (Maturana).pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa
000000998 8564_ $$s148466$$uhttps://systemika.g-i.cz/record/998/files/Glasersfeld, Ernst von - Distinguishing the Observer: An Attempt at Interpreting Maturana.pdf$$yoriginal
000000998 909C4 $$dhttp://www.oikos.org/vonobserv.htm$$pDistinguishing the Observer
000000998 980__ $$aTRANSLATION

000001337 001__ 1337
000001337 005__ 20150207171343.0
000001337 041__ $$ačesky
000001337 100__ $$0AUTHOR|(SYS)glasersfeldernstvon$$aGlasersfeld, Ernst von
000001337 245__ $$aNejdříve musíme být ve dvou
000001337 520__ $$aKonstruktivismus, jejž zastávám, je radikální právě svým pokusem vysvětlovat naše vědění jako vnitřní konstrukci a nikoli jako poznatek. Jistě víte, že celá velká oblast filozofie se nazývá teorie poznání. Vždy se snažím celou tuto oblast přerámovat a mluvit o teorii vědění, protože bych se právěchtěl odpoutat od poznání.
000001337 65017 $$apřeklady
000001337 700__ $$0AUTHOR|(SYS)strnadvratislav$$aStrnad, Vratislav$$epřeklad
000001337 773__ $$pSymposium Láska v systémech, Linz$$y1989
000001337 8564_ $$s225312$$uhttps://systemika.g-i.cz/record/1337/files/ve dvou.pdf
000001337 980__ $$aREPORT

000001812 001__ 1812
000001812 005__ 20170726093905.0
000001812 041__ $$aanglicky
000001812 100__ $$0AUTHOR|(SYS)glasersfeldernstvon$$aGlasersfeld, Ernst von
000001812 245__ $$aCybernetics and the Art of Living
000001812 520__ $$aSo let me start my talk by saying I sincerely hope that a knowledgeable scholar will collect and record the history of the first ten or fifteen years of cybernetics before too many of the fascinating personal and intellectual details of its inventors are irrevocably forgotten. I, unfortunately, am anything but a knowledgeable scholar. I only had by chance some opportunities to witness the development of this revolutionary discipline as an enthusiastic outsider who was profoundly influenced by it.
000001812 65017 $$astudijní materiály/autorské práce
000001812 773__ $$p13th European Meeting on Cybernetics and Systems Research. Vienna$$y1996
000001812 8564_ $$s74718$$uhttps://systemika.g-i.cz/record/1812/files/Art of Living.pdf
000001812 980__ $$aARTICLE

000001833 001__ 1833
000001833 005__ 20150608164848.0
000001833 020__ $$a978-90-8790-085-4
000001833 041__ $$aanglicky
000001833 100__ $$0AUTHOR|(SYS)glasersfeldernstvon$$aGlasersfeld, Ernst von
000001833 245__ $$aKey Works in Radical Constructivism
000001833 260__ $$aRotterdam$$bSense Publishers$$c2007
000001833 300__ $$a323 s.
000001833 520__ $$aWestern philosophers have with few exceptions perpetuated the belief that true knowledge exists apart from the knower. Although they have been unable to show how it might enter the human head, they have staunchly condemned as ‘genetic fallacy’ any investigation of how the knower might generate it. The essays in the section on the theory of knowledge are intended to provide teachers, parents, and perhaps students themselves with a more fruitful philosophical background.
000001833 653__ $$0SUBJECT|(SYS)kybernetika$$akybernetika
000001833 653__ $$apoznání
000001833 653__ $$aklasika
000001833 8564_ $$s2421530$$uhttps://systemika.g-i.cz/record/1833/files/Key.pdf$$yoriginal
000001833 909C4 $$dhttps://systemika.g-i.cz/record/1967$$pPřeklad 22. kapitoly
000001833 909C4 $$dhttps://systemika.g-i.cz/record/2034$$pPřeklad 1. kapitoly
000001833 909C4 $$dhttps://systemika.g-i.cz/record/2039$$pPřeklad 13. kapitoly
000001833 909C4 $$dhttps://systemika.g-i.cz/record/2038$$pPřeklad 6. kapitoly
000001833 909C4 $$dhttps://systemika.g-i.cz/record/2037$$pPřeklad 5. kapitoly
000001833 909C4 $$dhttps://systemika.g-i.cz/record/2036$$pPřeklad 3. kapitoly
000001833 909C4 $$dhttps://systemika.g-i.cz/record/2035$$pPřeklad 4. kapitoly
000001833 909C4 $$dhttps://systemika.g-i.cz/record/2040$$pPřeklad 16. kapitoly
000001833 980__ $$aBOOK

000001834 001__ 1834
000001834 005__ 20190702094352.0
000001834 041__ $$aen
000001834 041__ $$aanglicky
000001834 100__ $$0AUTHOR|(SYS)glasersfeldernstvon$$aGlasersfeld, Ernst von
000001834 245__ $$aHomage to Jean Piaget
000001834 520__ $$aJean Piaget was born in Neuchâtel in August 1896. Last year’s centenary of his birth was an occasion for celebration in many places of the Western world. The basic reason for this international attention was the unquestionable fact that Piaget was the founding father of a branch of psychology that tries to unravel the mysteries of the human mind, how it grows and how it comes to know.
000001834 600__ $$0AUTHOR|(SYS)piagetjean$$aPiaget, Jean
000001834 65017 $$astudijní materiály/autorské práce
000001834 8564_ $$s90619$$uhttps://systemika.g-i.cz/record/1834/files/Glasersfeld, Ernst von - Homage to Jean Piaget.pdf
000001834 909C4 $$dhttps://systemika.g-i.cz/record/2362$$pPŘEKLAD
000001834 980__ $$aARTICLE

000001836 001__ 1836
000001836 005__ 20150218104225.0
000001836 041__ $$aen
000001836 041__ $$aanglicky
000001836 100__ $$0AUTHOR|(SYS)glasersfeldernstvon$$aGlasersfeld, Ernst von
000001836 245__ $$aKnowing without Metaphysics
000001836 520__ $$aLike any apparently novel approach to the basic epistemological problems of 'knowledge', the constructivist ideas that have spread in the last twenty years continue to generate a host of negative as well as a few positive reactions. I shall focus on some aspects of Radical Constructivism, as distinct from 'trivial' constructivisms,
000001836 65017 $$astudijní materiály/autorské práce
000001836 8564_ $$s111758$$uhttps://systemika.g-i.cz/record/1836/files/Glasersfeld, Ernst von - Knowing without Metaphysics.pdf
000001836 980__ $$aARTICLE

000001837 001__ 1837
000001837 005__ 20150207160238.0
000001837 041__ $$aanglicky
000001837 100__ $$0AUTHOR|(SYS)glasersfeldernstvon$$aGlasersfeld, Ernst von
000001837 245__ $$aKnowledge as Environmental Fit
000001837 520__ $$aIn the philosophical tradition of the Western World, it is held that knowledge forms a sharp contrast to belief, opinion, hypothesis, and illusion. What is called “knowledge,” is supposed to be not only unquestionable but also independent of the knowing subject. Knowledge, therefore, is considered much more than know-how. It is intended to refer to a “true” picture of the world, of objects and events, and of the rules and laws that govern them.
000001837 773__ $$pMan-Environment Systems$$v1983
000001837 8564_ $$s263005$$uhttps://systemika.g-i.cz/record/1837/files/Glasersfeld, Ernst von - Knowledge as Environmental Fit.pdf
000001837 980__ $$aARTICLE

000001840 001__ 1840
000001840 005__ 20170726093339.0
000001840 041__ $$aanglicky
000001840 100__ $$0AUTHOR|(SYS)glasersfeldernstvon$$aGlasersfeld, Ernst von
000001840 245__ $$aTeleology and the Concepts of Causation
000001840 520__ $$aThe term ‘teleology’ was coined by the philosopher Christian Wolff in his Latin treatise of 1728 and he defined it as indicating the part of natural philosophy that explains the ends, or purposes, of things. 1 It has been used to describe a prominent feature of the theological views of Thomas Aquinas and the metaphysics of Aristotle.
000001840 65017 $$astudijní materiály/autorské práce
000001840 773__ $$n2$$pPhilosophica$$v46$$y1990
000001840 8564_ $$s367379$$uhttps://systemika.g-i.cz/record/1840/files/teleology.pdf
000001840 980__ $$aARTICLE

000001850 001__ 1850
000001850 005__ 20170726093319.0
000001850 041__ $$aanglicky
000001850 100__ $$0AUTHOR|(SYS)glasersfeldernstvon$$aGlasersfeld, Ernst von
000001850 245__ $$aThe Constructivist View of Communication
000001850 520__ $$aHeinz von Foerster had a knack for statements that sounded paradoxical. In fact, they made a lot of sense when they were unpacked. At the very beginning of our joint recollections in “Wie wir uns erfinden”, a book we published together a few years ago, he said for example: “It’s the listener, not the speaker, who determines the meaning of an utterance.”
000001850 600__ $$0AUTHOR|(SYS)foersterheinzvon$$aFoerster, Heinz von
000001850 773__ $$pA.Müller & K.Müller, Eds. An unfinished revolution?$$y2007
000001850 8564_ $$s172431$$uhttps://systemika.g-i.cz/record/1850/files/Glasersfeld, Ernst, von - The Contructivist view of comunication.pdf
000001850 980__ $$aARTICLE